What about that meeting in a basement…

The title is half a joke. In one of my grad school classes, we were discussing NCLB and standardized tests, particularly in how they relate to ELLs and bilingual students/newcomers, etc. Immediately, one of my classmates had a moment of clarity and began talking about how she was going to organize a meeting in her basement to get teachers and parents to demand a boycott of these tests. It was said partly in jest, and partly in frustration.

So, seeing this post on a fellow teacher’s blog really has me wishing such things would really happen here. I have to say, I had never even thought of random sampling as an alternative to every child being tested! I don’t know if it’s the most popular alternative on this side of the border – or the best option – but it’s certainly an approach that would allow for scientific analysis (leaving aside the debate over the validity of the tests, however).

My favorite quote:

Lanzinger said teachers may be employees, but they are also professionals. “We are not going to do something that’s bad for students and bad for public education.”

test prep as a genre?

I agree so much with some of the comments in this post on a fellow teacher’s blog, –  the ELA does not so much test how good a reader a child is, but tests how good they are at taking reading tests. The differences in reading levels among my students is quite significant – I have students who read level E/F (books that don’t even have dialogue) and students who read level M (which has chapter books). And yet some of my lower-level students score better than my students who are on level M (which is grade level). Some of my lower readers are actually more critical readers and better at these tests for various and many unknown reasons.

Three different parts of our curriculum – reading, writing and read aloud – are for test prep. We are to take away one period of two other subjects for test prep as well.  While teachers get criticized for teaching to the test, that is exactly how we are curtailing the students’ education.

If we were true advocates for our students, shouldn’t schools be opposing these tests and organizing parents to do the same? And there are so many legitimate research-based reasons to oppose these tests – whether you choose to look at it from the point of view of ELLs or not.  On the other hand, my school knows historical fiction, fairy tales, fables, legends, poetry, biography, etc., may be on the test, and yet they choose to spend two whole months on Fiction and one whole month on non-Fiction, leaving just days to teach each of these other genres.

test prep

I know I’m not alone when I say I hate test prep, that time of year in third grade and up when 80% of instruction is focused on teaching strategies for taking state-mandated tests like Math or English Language Arts.

But I don’t just hate it because it is mindless, scripted lessons. Sometimes its nice to have lessons that are already worked out even if they still have to be tailored. And I often feel like my own lessons fall flat anyway. But what really bothers me is it makes me feel so incompetent.

The lessons and teaching points we are given are so poorly written and organized that we are setting the kids up for failure. Like the first time we teach kids about historical fiction, it is to focus on the types of questions asked. There is no time to spend to really dig into it and read some. And then that is it. Maybe one other lesson talks about historical fiction. This is the equivalent of cramming except usually when you cram for a big test, it is both your choice and with material you have had some prior experience with. At first I honestly just thought it was me. That I am inexperienced and disorganized and that’s why it hasn’t been working well but the reading teacher told me all the teachers are having a hard time with it!

Talk about setting the kids up for failure…